The Juggle
No matter what 'social norms' say, Internet dating landscape inevitably leads to it
There once was a boy named Jack who really pissed the hell out of Jill.
It seems Jack liked to dip his pail in the well. The only problem was it was Jill’s … and Jane’s … and Jessica’s … and …
You get the picture.
This bastardized allegory could easily see the roles reversed as men and women for eons have waged a battle we more commonly know as dating multiple people at the same time.
It’s a national pastime. But as any lad or lass familiar with affairs of the heart can certainly agree, it can be quite a slippery, uh, slope to adroitly perform “the juggle,” that act of balancing several women, or men, at once, all in the hopes that one never finds out about the others.
Our culture and its widely promulgated principle of monogamy historically frowns upon such improper dating etiquette. Don’t you love how the Internet has literally changed turned our boring lives upside down?
With sites like Match.com, eHarmony, American Singles, Chemistry.com and Singles.Net, just to name a few, dating has become akin to shooting ducks in a barrel, really how we (as in us guys) always hoped it would be. In fact, the good people at Pew Internet Research say some 10 million Americans are online daters. I’m obviously merely preaching to the choir when I say there are a lot of options out there.
A LOT!
So, with some 5 million choices, or if you interested in specifics about 100,000 more than that being women, if you adhere to the findings of census takers that there exists about 0.1% to 0.2% more of that gender than men in our core Internet dating age group of 20-45, how do we limit ourselves? It’s a virtual Garden of Eden out there, where for every rotten apple ripe with worm holes there are five or six shiny, sexy, red apples for the picking? It’s like spending $20 at a really tasty all-you-can-eat buffet … you just HAVE to get your money’s worth no matter how swollen your belly. And the bastards keeping replacing the desert line with some new treat you can’t resist tasting.
How do we settle for that one person when at every mouse click your dream girl (or guy) seemingly awaits? It’s what we in the biz call a conundrum. You’re damned if you do. Damned if you don’t. What was once a dating no-no has morphed into the status quo.
More often than not I’m feeling the fire of Hell lap at my nether regions. And let me tell you THAT can really the squeeze on one’s dating life. Perhaps it’s because I’ve never been particularly good at the juggle, except that one summer when I was 20, back in the days when people met the opposite sex the good old-fashioned Southern California way: making a fool of yourself at the beach. It is true that girls love a guy who can make them laugh. Please don’t judge me by this column alone.
But it is true that the whole point of these Internet dating sites is to put up some photos of yourself (most of which are doctored in some way) and a bio that reads like you have discovered the cure for cancer all in the hopes of attracting your perfect mate, or at least lots of chicks to possibly bed.
It’s a numbers game we play. How many people can we get to wink at us? How many emails can we elicit from our perfect portrait of ourselves? And, invariably, how many people can we get away with “dating?”
As we Americans have grown adept at doing, we never know when to say when. We binge and purge. We over-consume. Cram down as many profiles as we can to win ourselves that ultimate date. And if that date doesn’t cut it, well, try, try again.
What it’s become is acceptable to date, and date, and date. And the sites themselves wouldn’t have it any other way. If you dare cancel your subscription, your inbox invariably will continue to receive emails from would-be suitors. Some even include photos to really goad you. So it’s no use resisting.
Grab your pail and gather.